Search found 1079 matches
- Sat May 27, 2006 6:09 am
- Forum: CPS Investigations
- Topic: second CPS investigation, both from anonymous tips
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3075
Re: Don't know if this will help, but...
I am a CPS investigator, and nothing thrills me more than a case that is unfounded. I love to walk in and find that the children are safe and well-treated and not being abused or neglected. It makes my day! I think (and hope!!) that we all feel this way. Well that's good to know, and I certainly fe...
- Fri May 26, 2006 5:05 pm
- Forum: CPS Investigations
- Topic: could this be?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1595
- Fri May 26, 2006 10:44 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: Corporal punishment
- Replies: 34
- Views: 5074
- Thu May 25, 2006 7:26 pm
- Forum: Newcomers - Welcome to the site - please sign in here
- Topic: DESTROY CALIFORNIA CPS!
- Replies: 48
- Views: 6565
- Thu May 25, 2006 6:43 pm
- Forum: Newcomers - Welcome to the site - please sign in here
- Topic: DESTROY CALIFORNIA CPS!
- Replies: 48
- Views: 6565
Now you're getting into potential RICO issues and I know at least one federal appeals court that decided RICO is not applicable to government workers (how convenient) but I also know another federal court allowed a RICO claim to continue though the pleadings stage. As far as statute of limitations, ...
- Thu May 25, 2006 5:45 pm
- Forum: Newcomers - Welcome to the site - please sign in here
- Topic: DESTROY CALIFORNIA CPS!
- Replies: 48
- Views: 6565
Actually, I learned a bit more about statute of limitations a short while ago. Although there are certain fixed statutes of limitation, it is actually up to the judge to rule on it when challenged and it is appealable. The statute of limitations in civil cases depends on the venue, but let's say it'...
- Thu May 25, 2006 5:32 pm
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: The children come first. The goal is reunification.
- Replies: 214
- Views: 27184
- Thu May 25, 2006 3:57 pm
- Forum: Legal Research
- Topic: Pro Se Standard of Review
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1567
Pro Se Standard of Review
For those who file lawsuits pro se, you will encounter opponents hell bent on trying to get the judge to dismiss the lawsuit, below, please find ammunition that you may be able to use to try to beat these attempts at dismissal. Thomas Dutkiewicz is extremely well versed at case law. He sent me sever...
- Thu May 25, 2006 2:36 pm
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: An actual Motion - seriously
- Replies: 47
- Views: 6982
Dan keeps saying the lower court is not the proper forum to raise constitutional issues. The questions one has to ask: Why on earth would anyone with allegedly 18 years of experience spew that kind of dangerous advice? Why would you not raise constitutional issues in the lower court, how on earth wo...
- Thu May 25, 2006 9:43 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: 06/02/06
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3743
- Thu May 25, 2006 8:19 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: 06/02/06
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3743
Last Monday the Chairman of a Family Rights organization posted on their website that I have "one of the best if not the best record of bringing children home." Yep, that was Bruce Bayer of Heads Held High, the only way he believes that it's true is because you told him that. No one has any way of ...
- Thu May 25, 2006 6:58 am
- Forum: CPS Investigations
- Topic: Unconstitutional Interviews
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3306
- Thu May 25, 2006 6:05 am
- Forum: CPS Investigations
- Topic: Unconstitutional Interviews
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3306
I then filled it out as as non-biased person who had actually done an investigation and found that if anybody in CA has children, your children are at risk of CPS intervention. ... As for the assesment that I did on ourselves, we fell into the low risk bracket. So if you were a biased CPS investiga...
- Thu May 25, 2006 5:40 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: The children come first. The goal is reunification.
- Replies: 214
- Views: 27184
- Wed May 24, 2006 8:42 pm
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: The children come first. The goal is reunification.
- Replies: 214
- Views: 27184
Re: To Bob Lynn
I will appreciate it if you could confine your activity here to helping people with their CPS cases. I'd like to be clear on what you're saying. Are you saying that I should not post any information or suggestions regarding any activity in the fight against the system in general? Or any new case la...
- Wed May 24, 2006 2:21 pm
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: Why I WANT to See a Family in an Appeals Situation
- Replies: 39
- Views: 5625
- Wed May 24, 2006 11:08 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: Why I WANT to See a Family in an Appeals Situation
- Replies: 39
- Views: 5625
I don't know what state you're in but I just want to inform you the Judicial Review Board in Pa. is totally worthless. There is no way they will do anything about corrupt judges in Pa., it's been tried countless times and I believe only one judge has been impeached in Pa. in the last 5 years and tha...
- Wed May 24, 2006 10:06 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: 06/02/06
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3743
Ok thanks, you really didn't need to go through all that trouble though, I have a mirror handy. Are my posts preventing anyone from posting anything? From what I see, there's lots of activity going on with many posters helping other posters with advice, even while I post, so I would hazzard a guess ...
- Wed May 24, 2006 9:40 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: 06/02/06
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3743
- Wed May 24, 2006 8:47 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: The children come first. The goal is reunification.
- Replies: 214
- Views: 27184
- Wed May 24, 2006 8:31 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: Why I WANT to See a Family in an Appeals Situation
- Replies: 39
- Views: 5625
Sullivan, just thought that you should know that we got are son back AFTER we threatened to take the goons to FEDERAL COURT for violations of our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS! Returned to us in 24 hours with no strings attached. No "probationary" period (which is illegal), no nothing, just "go pick him up...
- Wed May 24, 2006 7:44 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: Why I WANT to See a Family in an Appeals Situation
- Replies: 39
- Views: 5625
Thanks Ruth but I'm not a dreamer. I'm under no illusion that things will change because of me. What I want to do is bring attention to the cause in any way I know how. I want to try to educate as many people as I can to what's going on and what is needed to correct the problem or at least alleviate...
- Wed May 24, 2006 6:29 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: Why I WANT to See a Family in an Appeals Situation
- Replies: 39
- Views: 5625
Re: Why I WANT to See a Family in an Appeals Situation
You mean information from you, Bob, such as, etc. Hi Dan, I made some changes to the "Constitutional Violations" document based on your (ahem) "suggestions" that I agreed with. I suggest you read "Children as Chattel" before you "suggest" changes to the 13th Amendment notation I made. http://www.fa...
- Wed May 24, 2006 6:11 am
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: Why I WANT to See a Family in an Appeals Situation
- Replies: 39
- Views: 5625
before you go off on the "Bruce Bashing" posting please save your energy. It seems to me you just wasted your energy. If anyone goes off on bashing, read your boss's recent post, you know the one right after he posted "We will maintain a positive and proactive position and refuse to get involved in...
- Tue May 23, 2006 6:08 pm
- Forum: Round Table
- Topic: Why I WANT to See a Family in an Appeals Situation
- Replies: 39
- Views: 5625
Once again Krista, you can't operate under the premise of not changing the laws because then you're guaranteed that nothing will ever change. So you have to operate under the premise that you must change the laws and you must change them intelligently so the laws are enforced. Even to just make the ...