fightcps.com

I think it's time for you to walk, Sullivan. You think I need excersise? You need to start reading the responses to your asinine questions. Greegor didn't answer my questions. You work in collusion with CPS and the ideals of CPS. No I don't. Get them into programs! Everybody is guilty no matter wha...

I'm going to respond to each of your claims, Greegor. And you, as usual, will fail to answer, but for a very few, if that. How does Dan claim to KNOW the pain of a child removal? That's not what I said, Greegor. He was never in that situation because he was never CUSTODIAL in the first place! That'...

To answer Sullivan's questions: "Which rights did you claim were violated?" Well, which ones rights do they always violate? You can answer the question yourself, you know the system, you love to work with the system. We don't. Just because the system is in place and the machine is broken doesn't me...

Sullivan, just thought that you should know that we got are son back AFTER we threatened to take the goons to FEDERAL COURT for violations of our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS! Which rights did you claim were violated? Returned to us in 24 hours with no strings attached. No "probationary" period (which is ...

In my opinion, there is absolutely no conflict of interest in asserting one's rights in family court and pursuing any other avenue that will help get the children back as soon as possible. Did someone say that's a "conflict of interest?" Not that I saw. But I'll tell you where there is a conflict, ...

Trying to change laws is great except that still doesn't gaurantee they will be followed. That's right Krista but not changing the laws does guarantee they will not be followed. Not ENFORCING laws guarantees they will not be followed. So conversely, you make laws to make them follow laws, see the F...

By all means a family should assert their civil and Constitutional rights during their encounter with CPS and Family Court. So Dan, now that you've completely reversed your position on this issue, will you be advising your clients to assert their Constitutional rights during their encounter with CP...

you can print out a copy of what I posted and give it to them so they know and understand the issues and I'm sure if they have any questions, once you've studied it yourself, you'll be able to answer them confidently. http://forum.fightcps.com/viewtopic.php?t=4210 You mean information from you, Bob...

By all means a family should assert their civil and Constitutional rights during their encounter with CPS and Family Court. So Dan, now that you've completely reversed your position on this issue, will you be advising your clients to assert their Constitutional rights during their encounter with CP...

NOTE: This is not meant to be argumentative, but a counterpoint to Dan's article explaining why he never wants to see a family in an appeals situation. I respect Dan and what he does, but we operate from two entirely different philosophical bases, and ultimately, it is up to the individual to decid...

That's not the thread I was talking about. Try not to act dense on top of being an outrageous liar please. It doesn't matter what thread you were talking about, it was exactly the thread I was talking about when I said you started a thread intentionally to ridicule what I posted regarding using Con...

The thread I started doesn't have a single word of your's in it. You are joking right? You quoted me in the very first post that is also the title of the thread you started (copied below). Be careful not to step on your nose. Bob Lynn wrote "Yet the Constitution is the ultimate law and the minute a...

drose wrote:I have a lawyer. My husband is gone and Im getting a divorce. Im in New York. Kids are 4 and 6. Looks like Im getting the kids back soon.

Good for you.

Focus on getting the kids back.

Best, Dan

Yes there has been a big juridiction issue because one case was opened in Wyandot county while I was moving and the other was opened there after I moved. Both Counties participated in the investigations, Richland County did the safety check on my house and reported its findings to Wyandot County wh...

Why do you need to start a new thread with a post duplicated from another thread? Because I thought it was an important message and I thought more people would read it as a new post compared to it being buried in the other thread. Why did you start another thread disguised as a question when it was...

Bob_Lynn wrote:Sure Dan, I understand. Same with the thread you started for the purpose of ridiculing my point on Constitutional rights, it was really only a question, right?
Strawman Bob.

Ridiculing you, Bob?

Get over yourself.

The thread I started doesn't have a single word of your's in it.

Your nose gets bigger with each post Dan. "Strawman", right Dan, good one, do you cha-cha too? What you deliberately "fail" to see, is that you make a statement when you ask the type of questions you ask, Questions are questions, Bob. Questions are not statements... no matter how much you wish they...

I never said family court wasn't the proper place to assert someone's civil rights... and I didn't say "one should only assert their rights during the appeals process." Sorry Dan, you're now outright lying , you posted in this thread: "Would that not be because a family court isn't the forum for ci...

Bob_Lynn wrote:

Dan Sullivan wrote:Just to set the record straight, I never said someone shouldn't assert their rights... during the CPS investigation or in Family Court.

Right Dan. Do you actually believe people can't read your blatant lies?

Do you never get tired of being discredited, Bob?

Keep in mind, Dan, that what i am suggesting is that until an injunction or higher court ruling dismisses the lower court ruling, you should strongly consider starting services, to prepare for the possibility that you may lose in a higher court. But you should BEGIN your defense by asserting your C...

Keep in mind, Dan, that what i am suggesting is that until an injunction or higher court ruling dismisses the lower court ruling, you should strongly consider starting services, to prepare for the possibility that you may lose in a higher court. But you should BEGIN your defense by asserting your C...

Thanks, Dan, good information to have. I should have been more clear. I'm talking about those on here that has had the CPS goons secure one on an anonymous tip. Dan, was a warrant secured for your home to search for weed by the CPS goons? I Googled warrant anonymous tip. That info came up.

DontBiteMyNose wrote:I would like to know how many people here (US Citizens only) that have had a warrant executed on their homes based on an anonymous tip.

Just that, nothing else.

http://www.marijuanahydro.com/bigbrother.html

"Yet the Constitution is the ultimate law and the minute anyone walks into any courtroom, whatever the charges, criminal or civil, the primary defense is Constitutional law" It doesn't state in the Constitution that someone can't sell illegal drugs from their home... so if CPS removes children from...

This is another very good point Momof31995. CPS wants the family to fail, this is why if you jump through their hoops which they try to make impossible, even if you happen to succeed, they will only give you more hoops to jump through. These "hoops" are not about getting your family's act together,...