fightcps.com

What it means is that if the state accepts foster care funding, they voluntarily waive their immunity protection. What that means is that if you sue CPS and/or the state for violating your civil rights in a CPS case, they don't have immunity protection under the 11th Amendment because they waived it...

You don't file multiple lawsuits, you file one federal complaint and name all who violated your rights in the lawsuits. In the one lawsuit, you can sue the state, the county, cps and everyone involved individually. The filing fee was unfortunately raised to $250 (from $150) but you can file somethin...

CPS usually has its own attorney who is on their payroll and always in family court prosecuting the parents in CPS' petition to kidnap children so the money trail can begin to flow. You may need to ask the "supervisor" who is "not allowed to talk to attorneys" which CPS criminal actually has the hon...

I would have both or whichever applicable parent file an affidavit claiming that they were coerced into signing an "agreement" with CPS in addition to rescinding any and all "agreements" that they actually did sign. You also need to look up the federal law on hostage taking. Since they were coerced ...

I was posting while you were posting so we crossed posts. The police haven't charged anyone with anything, it is therefore not a local police matter unless they want to make a case of it for themselves. Anything signed under duress is NOT VALID and not enforceable. The caseworkers are BSing everyone...

I'd like to add that you should even call the FBI and tell them who you are, who you represent and that the children have been kidnapped by the local CPS and demand their immediate return and an immediate investigation, I am dead serious. Don't let them get away with telling you it's a local matter,...

Diana, Many of the posts here are very good and I'll just add my opinion. First, you say there has never been any Hearing on this. If true, they have already violated the federal kidnapping laws. I don't know the California CPS laws or other California laws but there is no such thing as a state law ...

I agree 100%, if they can't charge and convict someone for a crime against their child, they have no business taking that person's child away.

They didn't give me those options,and now the DA says he is going to have the judge force me to tell what we talked about. They didn't care about my opinion and or rights. First off, it's not up to them to give you those options, they were given to you when the Constitution was ratified over 200 ye...

It's difficult to know what the best course of action is for you Angel but if you don't want to answer any specific question, you can always say: "I respectfully decline to answer the question based on my rights under the 4th, 5th, 6th and 9th amendments to the United States Constitution." They cann...

It sounds like you have all your bases covered Gary. Our suits are all at the pleadings stage (8 months into it now). Our attorney is working on an Amended Complaint. I think he's being overloaded because as soon as he's ready with it, I hit him with more information that I keep coming across, thank...

I agree with you Gary, go for it. For example, we named the family court judge in our lawsuit as did the other 2 lawsuits. We fully expect the federal judge to dismiss the family court judge on the grounds of absolute judicial immunity. But, we want to destroy this judge even if she is dismissed fro...

You better get another opinion because I heard from many sources that the statute of limitations on a civil suit is 2 years. A child can file a civil suit within 2 years of turning 18 for violations perpetrated anytime prior to his/her 18th birthday. A crime is another matter, anyone committing a cr...

I posted this on another thread Kdddav, the 5th Amendment did not change. The Supreme Court did what they were designed to do, interpret the Constitution. In this case, they interpreted a portion of the 5th Amendment that deals with the application of eminent domain.

Note, the 5th Amendment DID NOT CHANGE. The Supreme Court merely interpreted a portion of the 5th Amendment, the application of eminent domain. This can be re-interpreted by the Supreme Court at a later date (if it's brought up to them again and they decide to hear it). Only another new Amendment ca...

ok mine happened in 2001 doethat give them immunity then . and they had a warrant for me does that give them right to take my kids... they said that the police had called them and told them they were coming to arrast me and th efather was n jail. but didnt i have the right to call someone to get th...

Don't know if we can because the State of Georgia furnishes Malpractice Insurance to the employees of DFCS as part of their compensation, but we plan to ask the court to make the individuals pay for their own defense (just as we have all had to do) and not be able to use taxpayer money to defend th...

I posted the following on the Heads Held High forum so I'll repeat it here: Title: The law is the law Mr. Honorable David Souter "The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 two weeks ago that local towns and cities can seize homes and private businesses through eminent domain and turn the properties over to p...

My pleasure Mouse, beat them over the head with it.

You can sue anyone and everyone who violated your civil rights. In the case of people, you must sue them in their official and individual capacity. There are 15 different defendants in our lawsuit, including the state, the county, CPS, all the caseworkers involved, a judge, the CPS attorney, the Gua...

It means if you sue them for violating your civil rights under color of law and they claim that they're immune from being sued by you and ask the judge to dismiss the case on those grounds (they always do) it's then up to you or your lawyer to use the case law that Dazeemay found to beat their argum...

This one is better in terms of the 4th Amendment:

http://www.biloxischools.net/beauvoir/b ... rights.htm

Some of you want a simple explanation to a crucial document that protects your inalienable rights and is the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, so I found it:

http://www.cyberlearning-world.com/nhhs ... xplain.htm

That beautiful person Dazeemay found this and it is a legal and literal ball buster for CPS and all their state colluders!!! The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled on June 28, 2002 in Missouri Child Care Association vs Denise Cross, et al that states lose their 11th Amendmen...

That beautiful person Dazeemay found this and it is a legal and literal ball buster for CPS and all their state colluders!!! The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled on June 28, 2002 in Missouri Child Care Association vs Denise Cross, et al that states lose their 11th Amendmen...