D. C.

A place to post and discuss news.

Moderators: family_man, LindaJM

Marina
Moderator
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:06 pm

D. C.

Postby Marina » Thu Apr 03, 2008 3:50 pm

.

http://www.examiner.com/a-1299859~Welfa ... hington_DC

Welfare officials miss deadlines, put children at risk

Mar 25, 2008 12:37 AM (9 days ago) by Examiner Exclusive by Bill Myers

Washington DC (Map, News) - Child welfare bureaucrats have allowed the deadlines to lapse in nearly 900 abuse and neglect cases, potentially leaving the children vulnerable to mistreatment and threatening to drag the city into court receivership, The Examiner has learned.

Under a consent decree stemming from a class action suit over the collapse of its child protection agencies, the District promised to resolve abuse and neglect complaints within 30 days.

It has never met the deadline. But since the badly decomposed bodies of four girls were found in a squatter's row house in Southeast earlier this year, the already hobbled Child and Family Services Agency has been flooded with complaints.

The backlog of past-due cases has more than doubled in the last month, records obtained by The Examiner show. It is at its highest point since July, 2004, when there were nearly 700 overdue investigations, records show.

City lawyers are due back in federal court April 1 to explain the District's reform efforts. If the court is unsatisfied with their explanation, D.C. could lose control of yet another critical agency.

Officials have been rattled by the discovery that welfare bureaucrats ignored signs that Banita Jacks, a homeless woman, was a threat to her kids. Jacks is now charged with killing her girls.

Since Jacks was arrested, calls to the city's abuse and neglect hotline have gone up by more than 400 percent, according to city records. There are now more than 1,600 open investigations, counting those filed in the last 30 days.

After the scandal broke, Mayor Adrian Fenty promised to fix the child welfare system. He summarily fired six officials whom he accused of mishandling the Jacks case. But some are worried that the mayor and the city are only reacting to events, not trying to shape them.

"We've been asking the mayor and the council to focus on services that will prevent children from having to be put in foster care," said Judith Sandalow, executive director of The Children's Law Center, an advocacy group. "We have an ongoing concern about the influx of calls."

D.C. Attorney General Peter Nickles could not be reached for comment Friday. Mindy Goode, spokeswoman for CFSA, did not respond to requests for comment.

.

Marina
Moderator
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:06 pm

Postby Marina » Sun May 11, 2008 11:43 am

.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 01920.html

A Case of a Family Services Job Well Done, or Overdone?


By Marc Fisher
Sunday, February 24, 2008; Page C01

On the Thursday before Labor Day, while Julianna Caplan was changing the diaper on one of her twins, she heard a dull thud. She turned around to see her other 8-month-old trying to push herself up from the floor, where she'd been playing, and knock her head.

There were no bumps or bruises, but over the next few hours, the little girl acted fussy, then altogether out of sorts. After she began throwing up and drifting off to sleep, her parents grew concerned, called the doctor and ended up at Children's Hospital.

The baby recovered fully within 24 hours, but almost six months later, Caplan and her husband, Greg, remain trapped in the District's frightening child-abuse system. It is a quicksand of bureaucratic paralysis, a warped mirror image of the indifference that permitted Banita Jacks's four girls to die in Southeast last year.

The city took both Caplan twins away from home and placed them in foster care for a time. The parents are still on the city's child-abuse registry, even though a court and police have found no evidence of abuse.

After Mayor Adrian Fenty fired six Child and Family Services Agency workers because they "just didn't do their job" in the Jacks case, social workers predicted that the pendulum would swing to the point that the slightest whisper of possible abuse would result in knee-jerk reactions against parents.

The Caplans' ordeal started before the horror of the Jacks case, but the Georgetown couple is convinced that their names are not being removed from the city's child protection registry largely because of the District's embarrassment over the Jacks case.

The parents believe the city was right to suspect abuse, right to investigate, right to run tests. But they say the case went off the rails when city lawyers continued to press abuse allegations even after the judge found no cause to proceed.

The twists in the case fill hundreds of pages of reports, but the bottom line is: The baby suffered retinal hemorrhaging, sometimes a sign of child abuse. When a doctor noted that, Child and Family Services intervened.

Because it was a holiday, the hospital had to wait several days to conduct tests to see if the baby had been abused. Those tests would find no reason to believe abuse had occurred. The police investigator would write that "all five examining physicians made no medical diagnoses or cause to support physical abuse." And D.C. Magistrate Judge Mary Grace Rook would find that "there are not reasonable grounds to believe that [the baby] was abused."

But Child and Family Services neither waited nor investigated. With lights flashing and four police officers on hand, social workers arrived at the Caplan house at midnight on the night after the baby entered the hospital. They took the infant's uninjured sister out of her father's embrace and put her in foster care in Prince George's County.

It was the first night she had ever spent away from her parents and her sister. It would not be the last.

She was forced to spend nearly two weeks at the foster care facility in Hyattsville. The injured sister, after her recovery, was kept in the hospital awaiting test results. Afterward, she was in foster care for five days. Both sisters were then reunited at home under their grandmothers' care, but on condition that the Caplans move out of their own house.

At a hearing, the city sought to keep the children separated from their parents, but the court rejected the abuse allegations, and the family was allowed back together.

"If they had had their way, we would have been out of our house for months," says Julianna, a former CNN publicist who now works from home as a freelancer. Greg is a manager for Lockheed Martin. They wiped out their savings and borrowed from relatives to raise $75,000 for legal help.

Just as disturbing as the agency's rush to judgment was their fixation on the Caplans because of their class, or, as CFSA head Sharlynn Bobo put it, their "privilege."

"This family is privileged and able to marshal significant resources to accomplish its goals and fight the allegations," Bobo wrote to her staff in September. "I believe that we made the right decision" to take the girls away from their parents.

Even after the court found for the Caplans, the city offered to end its investigation only if the parents submitted to counseling, anger management classes and unannounced visits from social workers. The Caplans declined the deal.

"It was like, what is the price of our morals?" Julianna says. "Do we lie and say someone abused our daughters to make this go away?"

Not everyone at CFSA was comfortable with what happened. In an e-mail to one of the children's grandparents, Deputy Director Roque Gerald criticized "defensive child welfare. In our attempt to protect, we have also lost the ability of balance for fear of retribution." Neither Gerald nor Bobo returned my calls.

D.C. Attorney General Peter Nickles says the city was right not to give the Caplans special treatment. "I am not going to treat you differently because you are an attractive, articulate couple," he says. "I'm not saying I would have done this the same way, but I see the law working its way."

Nickles says the Caplans may appeal to a neutral party -- an outside expert -- to be removed from the registry, which means they are automatic suspects if their children are injured and need care.

"They treat us with contempt because we fought back," Julianna says. "Who would not sell every stitch of clothing off their backs to fight for their children?"

Two days before the Jacks case broke, Nickles, then the mayor's legal adviser, met with the Caplans after Greg called Fenty on WAMU's "Kojo Nnamdi Show." Nickles then described the couple's ordeal as "Kafkaesque." But after the Jacks story broke, city leaders changed their tune.

Nickles denies any shift in his attitude. "It may very well be that the weight of the evidence supports the Caplans' position," he said. "But the law is skewed properly toward the protection of the child."

He says he agonized over the Caplan case, in part because one of his own children once fell out of a crib and was taken to the hospital. But he concluded that "the city was not overly aggressive."

Taking the girls from their parents was "traumatic, but this is a very law-driven process that can have very unsatisfying results. If this had been shaken-baby syndrome and something had happened to the second child, the public would have come down hard on us, quite appropriately."

Fenty says he "would rather err on the side of getting too many calls about abuse. That's exactly what we want to have happen."

The Caplans reject the idea that the city is only doing its job well by being on hair-trigger alert. "Do you believe innocent families have to get caught up in this?" Greg asks. "This is a false choice. What has to happen is not overreaction, but competence."

The Caplans plan to sue the District, seeking reforms in the child welfare system and reimbursement of what they spent fighting the allegations. The twins are happy and playful children now, but the daughter who spent two weeks in foster care "freaks out if I leave the room," Julianna says. "Before, she would let anyone hold her. Now, she screams."

.

Marina
Moderator
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:06 pm

Postby Marina » Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:13 pm

.

http://www.myfoxdc.com/myfox/pages/News ... geId=3.2.1

AgencyD.C. Child and Family Services on Emergency Basis
Last Edited: Friday, 18 Jul 2008, 7:10 AM EDT
Created: Friday, 18 Jul 2008, 6:09 AM EDT

D.C. Child and Family Services Agency


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Child and Family Services Agency will "act on an emergency basis" by getting social workers from other District offices and hiring more staff, a city official said.

The moves came Thursday after the recent deaths of several children, a backlog of cases and the resignation of the agency's director...


.

Marina
Moderator
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:06 pm

Postby Marina » Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:25 pm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... metro%2Fdc

Child and Family Services Agency
Licensing Rule Change Eases Hiring



By Petula Dvorak
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 25, 2008; Page B04

The District's child welfare agency has made significant progress toward ending its staffing crisis by hiring dozens of social workers in the past month, the result of a recent change in licensing requirements.

After losing almost 25 percent of its workforce in an exodus over the summer, the Child and Family Services Agency reported last week that it had hired 41 social workers in just a few weeks. That gets the agency more than halfway to its goal of replacing about 60 who left.

According to Mafara Hobson, spokeswoman for Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D), 32 of the hires do not have licenses. They will receive the same training as other hires but will be under supervision by a licensed social worker until they get their licenses. They will have four chances in the coming year to pass an exam and become licensed.

The change in requirements was first discussed soon after the city's attorneys reached a court agreement to avoid another federal takeover of the agency. D.C. Council member Tommy Wells (D-Ward 6) negotiated with the city's Board of Social Work to help the agency work toward reaching its full strength of about 250 social workers on staff, which was part of the court agreement.


The agency requires social workers to have a master's degree in social work and a license. The rule change permitting them to be hired before they are licensed was enacted as a temporary response to the sudden drop in staffing levels, but city officials say it could become permanent if it works well.

Although recent graduates from social work programs are eligible under the new standards, the rule change is primarily aimed at experienced social workers from other jurisdictions who are licensed there but have not taken the exam to get a license in the District, said Margot Aronson, president of the Greater Washington Society for Clinical Social Work.

Many of CFSA's new hires fit that description.

Wells, a former social worker, said a license is usually needed for private practice, such as marriage counseling, but it is not required of most social workers in the country.

"D.C. is one of the few jurisdictions in the country that essentially requires almost all their social workers to have a master's in social work," Wells said. The graduate degree ensures that District social workers are well-educated.

Easing the licensing requirement to spur hiring is not a new idea. Former CFSA director Olivia Golden tried something similar when she took over the agency in 2001 as it was exiting federal receivership.

"We were able to hire people as trainees, working within a framework, and they needed their licenses in 90 days," said Golden, now a senior fellow at the Urban Institute.

She said that as director, she was often frustrated each spring watching top graduates at social work schools go to agencies that did not require licenses to start work.

The D.C. agency tried recruiting at top schools and helping graduates schedule the licensing exam quickly so they could be eligible to work in the city soon after graduation. But it was tough to compete with jurisdictions that have different standards.

"Our ability to hire was constrained," Golden said. So the agency came up with the trainee position and gave signing bonuses to those who already had licenses.

Some of the new hires never passed the licensing test. The agency had to let them go and spend the time and money to find someone to take their place, Golden said.

The new system could prevent that problem by giving the trainees four chances to pass the exam in a year while still working, Aronson said.


Return to “In the News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests