firemonkey wrote:I did not intend to bash anyone
Really? So that post where you copied excerpts from many of my posts was what, a joke?
Corporal punishment
Moderators: family_man, LindaJM
Really? So that post where you copied excerpts from many of my posts was what, a joke?
We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. Edward R. Murrow
-
firemonkey
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:58 am
firemonkey wrote:you are referring to the post I submitted documenting your abusive posts. This is an entirely different matter and does not concern you.
Relax
That's another joke right? Posts that document my allegedly "abusive" posts don't concern me. So who do they concern, you?
(I'm relaxed, thanks)
We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. Edward R. Murrow
-
firemonkey
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:58 am
No problem Monkey, as long as you quit "not bashing anyone" with your bashing posts. Some people can dish it out but I guess those same people can't take it when the people they dish it out to take exception to the dishing out.
We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. Edward R. Murrow
There are non-spankers, people who do not believe
in spanking for their family. Most of them are
against making spanking ILLEGAL.
Then there are anti-spankers who are eager to
see all forms of spanking made illegal, and they
are even in favor of the CPS enforcing anti-spanking
laws that do not exist. Some of these people
are, to say the least, zealots.
One well known one is so foul, vituperative and
neurotic about the anti-spanking agenda that
a few of the non-spankers have actually stated
that he convinced them TO SPANK their kids!!
Some of his biggest detractors are non-spankers!
He also happens to be the most rabid stooge
for Child Protection agencies as well.
Dan and Kane provide references for each other.
Silly me, seeing a link list all stacked with
anti-spanking sites and from one of
Dan's ""references"" I thought for sure
it was Kane.
in spanking for their family. Most of them are
against making spanking ILLEGAL.
Then there are anti-spankers who are eager to
see all forms of spanking made illegal, and they
are even in favor of the CPS enforcing anti-spanking
laws that do not exist. Some of these people
are, to say the least, zealots.
One well known one is so foul, vituperative and
neurotic about the anti-spanking agenda that
a few of the non-spankers have actually stated
that he convinced them TO SPANK their kids!!
Some of his biggest detractors are non-spankers!
He also happens to be the most rabid stooge
for Child Protection agencies as well.
Dan and Kane provide references for each other.
Silly me, seeing a link list all stacked with
anti-spanking sites and from one of
Dan's ""references"" I thought for sure
it was Kane.
-
Dan Sullivan
- Posts: 1538
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 4:42 am
- Location: Long Island, New York
-
firemonkey
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:58 am
-
gideonmacleish
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 9:50 am
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests