Dutkiewicz lawsuit
Moderators: family_man, LindaJM
Dutkiewicz lawsuit
This lawsuit looks just like ours. However, we are about to amend our federal Complaint to include violation of 13th Amendment rights (involuntary servitude), among other things. If we win on that count, we will be setting precedent that many others can use.
Sorry, there is no link to the Dutkiewicz lawsuit. I contacted him and he sent me several documents via e-mail. If you want, contact him yourself and ask if he is willing to send you the same material.
As far as the 13th Amendment, please read the link below entitled "CHILDREN AS CHATTEL: INVOKING THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO REFORM CHILD WELFARE" and you will see how it applies to CPS and the foster care system.
http://www.familyrightsassociation.com/ ... en-chattel
As far as the 13th Amendment, please read the link below entitled "CHILDREN AS CHATTEL: INVOKING THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO REFORM CHILD WELFARE" and you will see how it applies to CPS and the foster care system.
http://www.familyrightsassociation.com/ ... en-chattel
A VERY BIG THANK YOU TO DAZEEMAY!!!
That beautiful person Dazeemay found this and it is a legal and literal ball buster for CPS and all their state colluders!!!
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled on June 28, 2002 in Missouri Child Care Association vs Denise Cross, et al that states lose their 11th Amendment immunity protection by virtue of waiving them under the Spending Clause, when they agree to participate in receiving foster care reimbursement under the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, also known as Title IV-E of the Social Security Act.
What that means is that EVERY STATE that receives foster care reimbursement from the federal government (I believe that's all 50 states) HAS NO IMMUNITY protection when they violate your civil rights!
Those greedy bastards who are really racketeers under color of law are now subject to choking on their own greed!
Please see the following link:
http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/02/06/013346P.pdf
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled on June 28, 2002 in Missouri Child Care Association vs Denise Cross, et al that states lose their 11th Amendment immunity protection by virtue of waiving them under the Spending Clause, when they agree to participate in receiving foster care reimbursement under the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, also known as Title IV-E of the Social Security Act.
What that means is that EVERY STATE that receives foster care reimbursement from the federal government (I believe that's all 50 states) HAS NO IMMUNITY protection when they violate your civil rights!
Those greedy bastards who are really racketeers under color of law are now subject to choking on their own greed!
Please see the following link:
http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/02/06/013346P.pdf
What it means is that if the state accepts foster care funding, they voluntarily waive their immunity protection.
What that means is that if you sue CPS and/or the state for violating your civil rights in a CPS case, they don't have immunity protection under the 11th Amendment because they waived it.
So the point is to get to your original question, no your children do have to have been in foster care for this to apply.
What that means is that if you sue CPS and/or the state for violating your civil rights in a CPS case, they don't have immunity protection under the 11th Amendment because they waived it.
So the point is to get to your original question, no your children do have to have been in foster care for this to apply.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests