New York Appellate Court

A place to post and discuss news.

Moderators: family_man, LindaJM

Mema
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:43 am
Location: New York/am resident Wisconsin
Contact:

New York Appellate Court

Postby Mema » Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:24 am

NY state appellate court rules that children can't be taken from parents just because house is messy. HOORAY for parents!!! This ruling should help not only New Yorkers but across the country as it can be used for case law in other cases. THERE IS A GOD AFTER ALL watching over us parents. Awesome news. Got so excited almost forgot. The case is In the Matter of Lyanah D. for anyone needing case law.
Mema <a href=http://www.squidoo.com/by_the_book_reform>STOP Child Protective Corruption Ulster County N.Y.</a>

Marina
Moderator
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:06 pm

Postby Marina » Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:44 pm

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-1453 ... e-is-messy

NY state appellate court rules that children can't be taken from parents just because house is messy
September 16, 9:50 AMAlbany CPS and Family Court Examiner
Daniel Weaver

Copyright Wikimedia Commons

The Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court, First Division, ruled yesterday that child protective services cannot take children from their parents solely on the basis of a messy or cluttered house. In the Matter of Iyanah D., the court overturned a New York City Family Court ruling by Judge Jody Adams that had determined the children had been neglected.

The appellate court stated in its decision:

"Family Court's finding of neglect was based solely on the condition, observed on one particular day, of the apartment where respondent father and Iyanah resided. The court adopted petitioner's allegation that the subject apartment's living room was cluttered with plastic bags containing clothes and home appliances, there were unwashed dishes in the kitchen, and an odor was emanating from dirty cat litter, and concluded by a preponderance of the evidence that this constituted neglect. Specifically, the court determined, without analysis, that these seemingly unsanitary conditions of the home posed an imminent danger to Iyanah. We recognize that although there may have been a lengthy history with respondent's family and the court, based on the sparse record before us, the unsanitary condition of the apartment, standing alone, was insufficient as a matter of law to find neglect. While the condition of the apartment was hardly ideal, it did not place the child's physical, mental or emotional state in imminent danger of impairment."

New York City's Administration for Child Services (ACS) admitted that it did not inspect the bedroom where Iyanah slept, nor did it remove Iyanah from the apartment until more than two weeks later.

The father explained to the ACS child protective services caseworker that the plastic bags of clothes and appliances were there because the family was getting ready to move. According to the appellate court's decision, the caseworker never attempted to confirm the father's explanation nor make a follow-up visit.

The father was charged with derivatively neglecting his other daughter, but ACS did not make that charge of neglect until a year later. The appellate court dismissed all charges of neglect.

Copyright 2009 Daniel Weaver.


Return to “In the News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests